Virtual QA Staff, Plus AI OASIS-E2 & HOPE QA That Reviews 100% of Charts
Get an OASIS-E2 and HOPE-trained QA reviewer, and the Lime AI platform that flags issues in real time across every chart. Together they augment your in-house QA team and dramatically improve documentation accuracy. Software is often included at no additional cost.
Pilot-friendly Try Lime for free
Virtual QA staff trained on OASIS-E2, HOPE, and PDGM compliance requirements. Augment your in-house QA team without long-term hiring commitments.
Powered by Lime AI
Get the staff and the software in one engagement.
Many staffing engagements include the Lime AI scribe and clinical platform at no additional cost, making your virtual QA reviewer and your in-house team dramatically more productive. Ask about software inclusion on the discovery call.
Features
Key Features
OASIS-E2 Chart Audits
Review OASIS-E2 assessments for accuracy, internal consistency, and PDGM payment optimization. Flag inconsistencies before submission.
HOPE Assessment Review
QA review of hospice HOPE assessments, capturing the regulatory nuances of the new CMS hospice tool.
Compliance Flagging
Identify documentation gaps that could trigger ADRs, audit findings, or claim denials. Surface patterns by clinician, branch, or visit type.
Clinician Feedback Loops
Provide structured feedback to clinicians on documentation quality, closing the loop between QA findings and clinician improvement.
Higher Documentation Accuracy
100% chart review (instead of sampling) catches errors that would otherwise reach submission and trigger denials or audits.
Skip the QA Hire
Experienced OASIS-E2 and HOPE QA staff without the hiring lift, ramp time, or retention pressure of in-house QA roles.
Scale With Census
QA capacity scales with your patient volume, surge capacity during high-volume periods, scale down when census drops.
Staff + Software = Force Multiplier
The only post-acute virtual staffing service that pairs trained staff with AI software, making your virtual team and your in-house team dramatically more productive.
OASIS-E2 / HOPE QA Reviewer
Credentialed QA reviewer trained on OASIS-E2, HOPE, and PDGM compliance, integrated with your in-house QA team and EMR.
Lime AI Platform
Many staffing engagements include Lime's AI scribe, OASIS QA, ICD-10 coding, and intake automation at no additional cost. Software inclusion varies by engagement.
Productivity Multiplier
Your virtual team works faster. Your in-house team works faster. AI handles the toil so people focus on judgment.
Software inclusion varies by staffing engagement and scope. We'll discuss specifics on the discovery call.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Lime's virtual QA staffing for home health and hospice.
Many virtual QA staffing engagements include the Lime AI platform, real-time AI OASIS-E2 and HOPE QA, automated documentation review, and clinician feedback workflows, at no additional cost. The combination lets your virtual QA reviewers cover 100% of charts (instead of sampling) while your in-house QA team focuses on coaching and complex cases. Software inclusion depends on the staffing arrangement and scope; we'll discuss specifics on the discovery call.
Lime's virtual QA staff review OASIS-E2 assessments (M-items, Section GG, BIMS, PHQ-2/9, SDOH), HOPE assessments for hospice, plan of care documents, visit notes for medical necessity, and ICD-10 coding accuracy. The scope can be tailored to focus on the highest-risk areas for your agency.
Yes. Lime's virtual QA staff include RNs with home health or hospice experience, COS-C-credentialed reviewers for OASIS, and staff trained on the HOPE assessment as CMS rolls it out. We match credentialing to your agency's review requirements.
Most agencies use virtual QA as augmentation rather than replacement, virtual staff handle the volume of routine reviews and surface issues, while in-house QA leadership focuses on high-risk cases, clinician coaching, and survey readiness. Some smaller agencies use virtual QA as their primary QA function with in-house oversight.
Virtual QA findings flow into your existing feedback loop, through your EMR's QA workflow, your task management system, or direct clinician communication. The goal is QA that improves clinician documentation, not QA that creates an adversarial review process.
Augment your QA team, with reviewers and AI working in tandem.
Book a Staffing Call